Chilled fingers but warm atmosphere this morning at the excellent demonstration against Nadine Dorries’s Sex Education (Required Content) Bill, which called for abstinence-only sex education for girls – but not boys.

My general thoughts on this are elsewhere, but I’ve been reflecting since on the words of Kate Smurthwaite of Abortion Rights (interviewed here), that we had to recognise that while Dorries is frequently an apparent figure of fun, both so fanatical and extreme, and so inept, as to not to seem a serious threat, the fact is that she’s useful cover for rather more controlled but equally dangerous and disturbing figures behind her who want to achieve much the same goals, of regarding women as the sexual gatekeepers, whose only appropriate position in bed is lying still on their back thinking of England – in strictly heterosexual, married beds of course.

It’s worth noting that 67 MPS – sixty seven – back the bill on its first reading, which allowed it to get to this stage. The debate can be found <a href = "http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm110504/debtext/110504-0001.htm#11050491000001">here (and well done to Labour’s Chris Bryant for speaking up in it!)

This is the roll of dishonour, the 67 MPS who voted for the Bill: Peter Aldous, Louise Bagshawe, Harriet Baldwin, Harriett Bebb, Karen Bradley, Julian Brazier, Fiona Bruce, Dan Byles, Alun Cairns, Ronnie Campbell (Lab), William Cash, Christopher Chope, Damian Collins, Tracey Crouch, Philip Davies, Nick de Bois, Nadine Dorries, George Eustice Charlie Elphicke, George Evans, Jonathan Fuller, Roger Gale, James Gray, Matthew Hancock, Matthew Heaton-Harris, John Hemming (Lib Dem), Dmian Hinds, Philip Hollobone, Bernard Jenkin, Gareth Johnson, Marcus Jones, Kwasi Kwarteng, Andrea Leadsom, Jeffrey Lefroy, Peter Lilley, Jonathan Lord, Anne Main, Michael McCann (Lab), Jason McCartney, William McCrea (DU), Anne McIntosh, Stephen McPartland, Stephen Metcalfe, James Morris, Stephen Mosley, David Nuttall, Matthew Offord, Ian Paisley (DU), Neil Parish, Priti Patel, Mark Pawsey, Stephen Phillips, John Redwood, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Andrew Rosindell, Lee Scott, Jim Shannon (DU), Henry Smith, John Stevenson, Bob Stewart, Andrew Turner, Robin Walker, Robert Walter, Mike Weatherley, Craig Whittaker, Gavin Williamson,
Tellers: Brian Binley and Thérèse Coffey.

They’re all Conservatives, unless otherwise marked, and I think a large majority of the new 2010 intake. They bear watching – and should you happen to have the misfortune to live in one of their seats, I’d suggest using your local paper or blog to highlight their vote.

Also worth keeping an eye on the controversial Christian charity Care.

In February, we saw Queensland, Australia, being hit by floods perhaps another sign of more extreme weather events. It was also the beginning of the so-called Arab Spring with the resignation of Mubarak in Egypt. This wave of events was not surprising in the face of a declining world economy and high prices for food and other basic goods. We welcome the change and hope that better governance may make a difference.

In March, it was the Japanese tsunami and the risks of nuclear contamination that took up the headlines. People turned to the Green Party in Germany for an alternative. We must push ahead with the real Green alternative – energy saving and renewables – as we recognise the risks with nuclear.

From April to early August, the US right caused chaos with the Republican dominated Congress refusing to lift the debt ceiling throwing the US into crisis and reducing its credit rating. Whilst the US President tried to avoid crashing the economy, here the government continued soldiering on – whilst ordinary people wonder if we are under the command of another Haig.

Things went terribly wrong in the UK in August when one police shooting in Tottenham led to violence flaring up around the country, scaring all of us
as we suddenly realised the fragility of what we took for granted. A thirst for consumer goods combined with a lack of hope for the future and a lack of respect for the current order, led to looting and rioting. Mindless violence in some cases, but moe often it seemed chancing it and petty theft in others.

All this time, in East Africa people starved as famine continued to rage. The dusty land no longer seems able to offer sustenance, and people walk miles and miles to camps in the desert and in the blinding sun.

The Occupy Protest that began in September seemed like a welcome relief – at last people were regrouping, it seemed, determined to push for change. The Arab Spring continued into the Autumn and Gaddafi was killed in October.

In November, the Localism Act is enacted and we worry what this means for stable social housing. For how long will people in Council flats safely be able to regard them as home? And the government then makes its Autumn Statement. The Tory offensive will continue and there will be more public sector cuts to come ….. until the green shoots are forced out of the rocky
ground.

And finally, December – the Durban talks produce no firm commitments though there are signs that China and India see the need for change. The next day Canada pulls out of Kyoto. We all sink into what could be despair, but isn’t
as we are all optimists who believe that things will change. At last we have had the CERN breakthrough – almost seen the God Particle whatever that may mean – even if it comes along with flooding in the Phillipines and children being swept away with the water.

All this time the Greens made an offering of a positive means for change. Caroline Lucas MP amongst many others visited St Paul’s. The solution is investing in our long term future and moving away from the short-termism of the markets. It’s about challenging the inequality, that in an insidious way weakens our society, by making sure the corporates pay their taxes and making sure that the best paid employee does not get more than 10 times the lowest paid.

The solution is about breaking up the companies and banks that are too big to fail – smaller at least is better. It’s about greater local self-sufficiency combined with an internationalist outlook.

It’s about a focus on well-being and unlocking our huge creativity– instead of all the tat of Christmas and all the hours spent shopping, we’d be making things with the community, with our families.

It’s great to see Cllr Apak demanding a crackdown on tax avoidance<, as reported in the Camden New Journal.

That’s one of the key Green Party demands and Caroline Lucas MP tabled a Private Member’s Bill in this respect earlier in the year – a shame that Labour did not do something similar in its 13 years in power.

We look forward to Cllr Apak’s support, when future contracts with major tax avoiders (such as Vodafone) come up, in using the Council’s commercial power to tackle this ill. (As Camden Green Party has previously called for<.)

It's time for all parties to wake up to the imbalance of power in our current system which means that big corporates get away with paying very little taxation worldwide.

After leaving my own picket line, we travelled to Camden Town Hall, Judd Street from Camden Town and we passed three other pickets. One by Bayham Street, one outside the Working Men’s college and one by St Pancras hospital. At Camden Town Hall, there was a large group gathered. Mostly Unison members like myself and also PCS union members.

I was surprised but pleased to see some Labour Councillors showing support outside the Town Hall as the Labour Leadership were saying they did not support the strike action. The Green Party Camden councillor was there, Maya De Souza, and she spoke to the crowd from the Unison open-decker bus.

She explained that no Green Party elected representative would cross the picket line today. (This was confirmed by BBC news, noted that this wasn’t just in England and Wales – Scottish Green MSPs also refused to enter Holyrood.) And that the Green Party was the only national party back the strike, with strong statements on it from Caroline Lucas MP and Jenny Jones, our London mayoral candidate.

Then we set off towards Lincoln Inn Fields, marching along Euston road and stopping off at other pickets that were still ongoing, such as one outside the UCH in Euston Road, and then the Colleges in Gower Street and Malet Street.

By the time we reached Holborn it was much larger. However there was a very long wait to get into Lincoln Inn Fields. I started to hear from other colleagues and friends who were asking where I was when they were at Trafalgar Square. Where was I?

Still at Lincoln Inn Fields at 2pm. The turnout was huge!

Later at about 3.30pm when we did finally arrive in Trafalgar Square I noticed the worrying new Police Cordon barrier.

I am quite worried about this as I think in large crowd situations people could be crushed against it. There certainly didn’t seem to be any need whatsoever for such a reaction from the police for the Union march.

Most of the marchers were women and many were on strike for the first time.

A friend tweeted that more information about it.

The Local Government Pension is one of the major obstacles to further privatisation of locally provided public services as private companies do not want to take this on.

To my mind this is yet another reason to work hard to keep the pension.

There are many reasons which brought two million people out on Strike on Wednesday, but three stand out to me:

1/ Making public sector employees pay a contribution towards reducing the deficit caused by the reckless unregulated banking sector is outrageously unfair.

2/ Making public sector workers work until they are nearly 70 is ill-though out. Many of the jobs are mentally and physically demanding. Many physiotherapists for example would not be able to physically support patients when they are nearly 70 years old.

3/ The Government has to stop demonising the public sector. Just because the private sector is not providing decent pensions does not mean it will help leaving more people pension-less. Instead the government should force private companies to provide more help to their employees.

The Culture and Environment Scrutiny Committee heard evidence from Camden Cycling Campaign’s Jean Dollimore, the ‘cycling champion’ councillor Paul Braithwaite and Tom Kearney, a resident of Hampstead who had first-hand experience of a serious traffic incident. The councillors present were clearly sincere and keen to address the problems the borough faces; let’s hope the other bodies they will need to work with can step up with the same vigour.

Jean Dollimore’s extremely useful presentation laid out some simple facts. Road speeds kill. Compare the 90% death rate of collisions at 40 mph with the 2.5% rate of those that take place at 20 mph – a direct argument for reducing the speed of traffic in Camden. Jean explicitly talked about rolling out far more 20 mph speed limits to protect cyclists, pedestrians and, yes, drivers.

It’s difficult not to get angry when you hear that Transport for London (TfL) has made commitments to improve the danger spots in Camden since 2004 and yet no action has been taken. Indeed the Kings Cross junction looks set to become more dangerous rather than less unless public pressure can prevent the dangerous proposed changes.

The specific junction at York Way/Gray’s Inn Road has a high average speed and heavy traffic use and yet not only is there no cycle lane the road lay out gives room only for two vehicles side by side and then forces them to merge mid junction – of course it’s dangerous! Simple measures, like forcing the merge well before the junction and the introduction of a cycle lane would cost almost nothing but would immediately make the junction safer for cyclists.

Councillor Linda Chung made an impassioned plea that “one of the problems is the police and how they work” with a very strong statement about how the Metropolitan Police is falling well short when it comes to investigating deaths and serious incidents on Camden’s roads.

Councillor Braithwaite made a number of very useful points in his presentation including the lack of safe pedestrian crossing along Euston Road (which can take an age to cross), the lack of action on the ten most dangerous junctions in London, the cycle super highway (or blue paint on the road to you and me) and also the fact that the Kings Cross area has had a new college, a concrete blocking plant and is building new housing in the area and yet there has been little to no action on road safety despite the fact that they are coming under more and more pressure.

Braithwaite declared he had real sympathy with those who called for TfL executive members to be charged with corporate manslaughter for the “carnage” on the roads.

Finally Tom Kearney made a very moving presentation on the very real personal cost of TfL’s road safety statistics. He powerfully stated that if TfL’s roads were a factory then the death rate would have had them shut down years ago.

He made particular reference to the way the school run for the private schools in the borough created a Grand Prix situation on the roads with parents driving their 4x4s like mad things to drop off the kids making the roads too unsafe for all the kids. He suggested a school run tax to be levied on private schools to force them to deal with the issue. It’s a nice idea – I wonder if it’s possible?

Certainly these parents don’t seem inclined towards walking buses or cycling with their kids to school making the roads more dangerous for everyone – we need new ways to encourage better behaviour. In his words they pay for their 4×4, they pay the school fees, well they can pay for danger they pose on the roads too.

Well said.

Sadly one negative theme was the difficulties people were having working with the police and TfL. We need to find more leverage where staff can’t or won’t help us improve safety.

The committee meets again on December the 5th and it was very pleasing to see how seriously the councillors concerned took the issue. Let’s hope that we can collectively pressure TfL to help us make our communities safer.

This follows her Youtube video from Day 1 of the Occupation of St Paul’s.

Top-notch speakers including
* Isabel Dedring, London’s deputy mayor for transport
* Professor Frank Kelly, Director of the Environmental Research Group, King;s College
* Simon Birkett, founder of Clean Air in London (CAL)

There will be exhibitions stands too.

Signup through airquality@camden.gov.uk or by phoning: 0207 974 6981.

More about air quality in Camden.

It’s the kind of event – particularly given there’s no extreme weather to explain it – that makes you wonder about the quality of maintenance. It made me look up Thames Water’s performance figures. Leakage in 2010/11 was 665 megalitres, which sounds like rather a lot of water. But not to worry, it was under the target of 674 megalitres.

A fascinating time was had at the apple day, particularly in learning about scores of varieties that you never see in the supermarket.

My favourites, by history anyway, included:

Dumelow’s Seedling (also called Dumeller’s Seedling, Dumelow’s Crab, Normanton Wonder and Wellington) – one of the most widely grown culinary apples of Victorian England, known for its flavour and keeping quality. (Pre cold-stores of course!). Very acid, and cooks to a rich puree. A recipe suggestion was to prepare with a sweeter cooker that keeps its shape, such as Wolf River, so the puree flows around the shape.

And the Old English Pearmain, along with the Costard the first recorded Norman apple (in 1204).

I was able to snatch a little time on Wednesday to show support for the protest against workfare outside the Welfare to Work Conference, held at the Business Design Centre in Islington. (Interestingly the protest organisers report that they paid for three, high-cost, tickets for this conference about this lucrative “industry” but were denied entry.)

As speakers explained, what’s increasingly happening is that unemployed people are being forced to work for their payment, getting far less than the minimum wage for their work, and providing free labour for for-profit, indeed highly profitable companies, from major supermarkets to discount stores to councils and charities.

No one would object to the unemployed being provided with appropriate training, but forced shelf-stacking, and other unskilled labour, at what should be regarded as illegal rates, absolutely can’t be defended.

There should be the opportunity for the unemployed to take up the internship-type roles with charities and public service institutions for significant periods, while not also being forced to jump through hoops to show they continue to look for work. But it should be voluntary, it should offer opportunities to acquire real skills, and it shouldn’t be an option for for-profit companies, which should paid proper wages to anyone working for them.

And as many of the speakers pointed out, if this work is being done by unpaid forced labour, it isn’t available to properly paid workers…

Speakers also highlighted the way in which parents caring for children are being forced to look for work from when the children are aged five, with potentially disatrous consequences for the children’s care, and the parents’ peace of mind.

More information from the organisers. (Blogger Harpy Marx was also there.)